In March I wrote a short post here tracing the history of double effect back through Augustine, Proclus, and Aristotle.
In particular, I mentioned that Aristotle's discussion of mixed actions contains some seminal aspects of double effect. Not being an Aristotle scholar, I didn't pursue this suggestion further, but I see now that Michael Pakaluk has published an article called "Mixed Actions and Double Effect" that presents a thorough look at the question.
The article appears in a volume entitled Moral Psychology and Human Action in Aristotle (OUP, 2011), edited by Pakaluk and Giles Pearson.
This is one of the only pieces I am aware of that makes a serious attempt to understand the origins of double effect prior to Aquinas.
It predates Aquinas? You mean you didn't invent it?!?!?!?!
ReplyDelete-r.d.
Unfortunately not, though Frances Kamm did 'invent' the doctrine of triple effect. I believe higher n-tuple effects are still up for grabs.
ReplyDeleteHi Matt,
ReplyDeleteWe are not alone, then!
I haven't read this yet. Would you be so kind as to send it to me if you have it? Much appreciated!
thanks,
ezio